Answers of qustion the Business process management (BPM)
please on time
and doing paraphrase and check my answer
What is the relationship between BPM governance and Capability Maturity Models?
Business process management governance refers to a set of approaches for aligning aspects of organizational management with the needs of the organizationas clients (Weskem, 2007). These approaches enable an organization to promote high levels of effectiveness and efficiency while at the same time striving for flexibility, innovations and integration with new technological advancements. This way, business process management attempts to continuously improve business processes
Capability Maturity Models, on the other hand, refers process improvement approaches which are aimed at helping organizations improve their performance. Capability maturity models are used to give guidelines on process improvement in the lifetime of a project or an entire organization. In both organizational development and software engineering, capability maturity models serve as process improvement approaches through which organizations get assess to essential elements which result into effective process improvement.
Capability maturity models and business process management governance are closely related in the sense that both address three important areas of product development, namely service establishment, delivery and management, product and service development as well as acquisition of products and services. Capability maturity models originated in the software engineering industry but have been incorporated over the years to embrace more other areas of interest such as design and development of hardware and related products, service delivery and the acquisition of these services.
Both business process management governance and capability maturity models provide a strong basis for product developers to achieve extreme levels of maturity in the software development process. Harmon (2007), points out that there are a number of factors that determine the maturity process of a software product in an enterprise. These factors include strategic planning as outlined by an organization, organizational culture and the type of technology that an organization adopts. Capability maturity models provide practical dimensions for building business process management applications in software engineering this way, business process management governance provides efficient productivity for realizing gains accruing from application of the capability maturity models.
In addition, the process of building a stable business process management application requires robust capability maturity models. When one considers capability maturity models from the pure project management perspective, it is realized that various phases apply in the software model. These phases of the capability maturity models are all characterized by holistic adoption of business process management governance principles (Nandyal, 2003). In this case, business management models are managed in the same manner as any other project often with such setbacks as delays, poor quality work and cost overruns. Capability maturity models are applied to address these setbacks, and this is achieved through putting in place iterative capability maturity models (Plenkiewicz, 2010).
A key relationship between capability maturity models and business process management governance underlies the fact that the levels and principles in various dimensions of maturity are derived from software development process. Business process management governance is essentially a programming paradigm that involves business developers and through this builds corporate assets that attempt to automate business rules and processes, integration components and information models. Additionally, business process management governance supports the particular methodologies that support the development of the capability maturity models as these models deal with the penetration of business process management models in organizations. The goal of the maturity models in this case is to link key corporate performance indicators with executes processes and rules.