COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE THEOLOGICAL TERMINOLOGY OF JUSTIFICATION BY FAITH BY JOHN PIPER AND N. T. WRIGHT

Hello,
I am a returned customer and I am ordering an update that need to be made concerning the chapter IV in the outline proposal which the writer 22793 Daiana Aquino has been working on it. I will send additional info in an attached file. Following are the initial instructions:

a) Chapter IV:
This is the chapter which will need a major change. There will be a need to find out a better wording for that. In this chapter we will still be dealing with a?Comparison and Complement of Piper and Wrightas Theories and also including my suggestion of a biblical model as a proposing for the dilemma between the two theories. This view is explained in the attached PDF file on the outline corrections.
There is a need to show my scholarly contribution to this study which is to join both views a?justification + sanctificationa? as Paul wrote in Romans 6:19-22 where he makes no distinction between the two concepts. Paul speaks of a?righteousness and holinessa? in Romans 6:19-22 as one thing an subject and this will be my scholarly contribution after comparing the two views where Piper advocates one sidea? justification knowing as the roota? and N.T. Wright advocates a?Sanctification a knowing as a fruit). I am proposing a biblical model which is the connection between the two views proposing that the a?root and the fruita? go together and overlaps each other. It seems that this biblical model would be a significant scholarly contribution for the polarization problem between these two views. This part of the chapter should be the major part bigger than the comparison between the two theories of Piper and Wright and also a concise comment of the dilemma of the SDA thinking on the subject. I am sending also two files attached about this concept.
Concerning the existing subheadings in this chapter, the only one which will remain is the following:
a? Their Perception of the Justification Dilemma
There will a need to create new subheadings and I am wondering which chapter will you include those implications on Atonement, Soteriology, Ecclesiology and Eschatology that is discussed in the background of the problem.

Regards,
Nilson