Compare and contrast management interviews

Group Paper: The students in each group will then compare responses to other studentsi?? interviews within the studenti??s group. The group will then write a 3 to 4-page group paper about their experiences, and compare and contrast their responses to see if there are unique differences (or similarities) within different industries or business types. Please use the attached interviews as source for compare and contrast paper.

GRADING RUBRIC

Rating

Description

90-100Exceptional

Demonstrates excellent, accurate understanding of all requirements including mastery of tools used to create the assignment. Employs appropriate and relevant information. Executes all requirements of the assignment including accuracy in formatting, data, & citation. Creates exceptional assignment in the most professionally appealing manner. No errors.

80 89Good

Demonstrates adequate understanding of requirements and use of tools to create the assignment. Employs adequacy of relevant information and accuracy with minimal errors.

70-79Fair

Demonstrates a very general/fair understanding of assignment design and requirements. Product and design are reflective of limited personal skills consistent with requirements. Accuracy & appearance lack professional appeal. Product reflects many errors.

60-69Poor

Demonstrates little or no evidence of understanding of assignment design and requirements. Product and design are not reflective of personal skills needed to be consistent with the requirements of the assignment. Product reflects excessive errors.

0-59

The assignment/product submitted is not relevant, is no match, or is incorrect for this assignmenti??s requirements. No assignment submission or an unreadable file submitted.