Merica at War: Supporters versus Non Supporters

Please let me know if you have any questions. My email address is mlo_52yahoo.com. My phone number is 330-206-8001. Please use my number only for purposes of this paper. My research paper is due soon. I need it on 5/26/10 for my on-line statistics class.

With my chosen topic, I planned to show an increase or decrease of support for the War on Terrorism. My hypothesis was that the amount of Americans in favor of the current war has decreased since it begun. I also planned to compare the support for our current war to that of Vietnam and World War II.

I spent a significant amount of time researching these topics and could find very little reliable information on the topic. I did conduct my own study. Please include this information in the research paper as well:
Spoke to 50 people who were between the ages of 20 & 30 during WWII, 50 people who were between the ages of 20 & 30 during Vietnam and 50 people who are 20 -30 currently. Here were my results: WWII: 47 supported, 3 did not VIETNAM: 29 supported, 21 did not CURRENT WAR: 23 support, 27 do not. Problems w/ my study is that it doesnt show difference between beginning and end of wars. Also, those asked were random and all in Northeast Ohio.

Here is the specific guidelines layed out by my professor:

Research Paper Description
In this research paper you will explore in detail one of the statistical approaches to research discussed in the course, implementing and applying it in the context of a specific application or methodological study. This will help you gain a deeper understanding of the topic of your choice, as well as to gain experience in translating these ideas into practice.
You should begin by choosing an application domain, data set, or methodological question of interest to you. This may be a topic presented in the course or simply a topic about which you are curious. You are encouraged to choose research problems relevant to your own research interests and activities.

The learner will find three (3) relevant research articles which:
support the importance of your problem,
discuss previous work on modeling/analysis in the area, and
cover technical aspects of the methods from class you will apply.

Introduction
Describe the issue, why it was selected, the perspective of the approach, and the scope of the paper. In essence, describe in this area what is being covered in the paper. Be specific and to the point. This is an important part of the paper. The introduction serves to engage the reader and defines the papers scope.

Statement of the Problem
Describe why the issue/topic is relevant, a problem/issue. It is important to provide literature sources in support of the importance of the need/issue/topic. For example, if discussing the impact of malnutrition on the brain development of American children, cite literature quantifying the number. Discuss the impact of the problem/issue. Overall, what makes this topic/issue so important that you are spending time/energy researching it? What happens if nothing is done about the problem? The problem or topic is to be stated as either a hypothesis, Children who watch violent television, more than four hours a day, exhibit more aggressive behavior than children who watch less than two hours a day.Or, the problem can be stated in terms of research question(s). 1) Do children who watch more than three hours a day exhibit more aggressive behavior than those who watch fewer than three hours a day? Or, 2) What is the association of aggressive behavior in children and violent media?

Literature Review
In this section, process and develop a written conceptual framework of the issue or problem that is being researched. For example, if the topic of the research is the correlation of violent video games and childrens aggressive behavior, the student finds published research studies supporting their assumption or hypothesis. It is generally good to also bring in a study that refutes the position of the researcher. Then the researcher explains using appropriate literature sources, why the opposing position should not be supported. The literature review is actually the making of a case for your hypothesis or research questions. Comments as to the worth, validity and impact of the research are also found in this section. The literature review should present a comprehensive review of the historical and current literature in the topic area.
In general, the literature review should: Identify what is the topic, what has happened in the specific research of the topic (describe the study, sample, findings, important points from the discussion in the research article a describe any variables that may influence the findings of the research). Address any key issues; political, social, legal, ethical implications the literature reports. What is projected if nothing is done; what has been tried? Support this section with relevant literatures/resource citations.
If there are pros and cons of a topic/issue, explore holistically a review of the literature reflecting alternative positions. The presentation of this section is the students understanding and conceptualization of what was found in the literature in support of their hypothesis or research question. It is not a series of article abstracts.

Findings
In this section, summarize and present the major findings. Select, minimally, three of those, in your judgment, that are the most important from the research that was reviewed.
In this section the findings, are presented, discussion of them are found in the following section, Discussion.

Discussion
This is an expansion of the findings section. It is presented in narrative format and based on the research and your critical thinking/analysis of the situation/issue.
This would include:
The topic/issue. Be specific.
Analyze and synthesize the literature:
Support your perspective with relevant literature. This is an important section as it reflects your ability to analyze the problem, critique what has happened, and then to hypothesize potential solutions for the problem.
Implications of the findings from the studies.
Evaluation of the literature: quality research, bias, concerns with validity/reliability, sample size, findings.

Conclusion
In this section, summarize in a general way but completely, what the paper covered. Restate the research questions or hypothesis. Discuss: why the topic was selected; the problem/issue briefly stated; the approach that was used; findings; solutions and suggestions or ideas that you as the researcher may have. In this section, a reader should be able to peruse the conclusion/summary and have a good idea what the researcher did and what was found.

References
Here include all resources used in the development of this paper. Use American Psychology Association Style. All literature/computer/interview/resources will be annotated. This section is graded on the appropriate format for the references, the quality of the study/literature relative to the topic and the annotation.

Content and Organization of the Paper
Should be 8-10 pages in length excluding title page, reference page, and any appendices.
Cover sheet a use the APA cover sheet style
Outline a use the format listed above as the major headers a specific topic components are secondary headings (see APA Format)
Abstract of the paper a the summary and conclusion of the paper may be used for this
Body of the paper a introduction, problem statement, background of the problem, issue/ needs/solutions and conclusion/summary
Any material to be placed in an appendix (i.e., tables, maps, etc.)
References a a reference listing using APA format, with the reference material annotated

PLEASE LET ME KNOW IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS!
mlo_52yahoo.com
330-206-8001
I need the paper by 5/26/10