Nnotated bibliography based on five articles on the topic Compare and contrast the emergent and intended approach to strategic management”

Individual Annotated bibliography

Provide a critical analysis of five relevant papers. This should still be relevant to the topic Compare and contrast the emergent and intended approach to strategic management”.
The annotated bibliography will be based on these articles on intended/emergent strategies. This will show theoretical application of the topic studied.

1. Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J. A., (1985) Of Strategies Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, PP 257-272

2. Mintzberg, H., (1990) The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, PP 171-195

3. Ansoff, H., (1991) Critique of Henry Mintzbergs The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, PP 449-461

4. Kipping, M., and Cailluet, L., (2010) Mintzbergs Emergent and Deliberate Strategies: Tracking Alcans Activities in Europe 1928-2007, Business History Review, Vol. 84 PP 99-104

5. Pretorius, M., and Maritz, R., (2011) Strategy making: the approach matters, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 32 PP25-31

General guidance to students on content and approach
The word limit is 1000 words (plus or minus ten per cent), including any appendix but not including the references. NOTE: The ability to communicate a cogent and coherent argument in a limited number of words is an academic skill required of students at level 6.
In total you are required to produce an annotated bibliography for five academic journal articles. You will read, review and annotate 5 papers related to the topic Compare and contrast the emergent and intended approach to strategic management”.
Help with the Individual Written Assignment

An annotation should include complete bibliographic information for the source. It should also include some or all of the following:
a? Main focus or purpose of the work
a? Intended audience for the work
a? Usefulness or relevance to your research topic (or why it did not meet your expectations)
a? Special features of the work that were unique or helpful
a? Background and credibility of the author
a? Conclusions or observations reached by the author
a? Conclusions or observations reached by you
As a student, you are normally writing an annotated bibliography as an indication of the sources you intend to use for an assignment, the presentation in this case. You should aim to write about 200 words, including the bibliography for each paper reviewed. Remember to relate your review to the topic Compare and contrast the emergent and intended approach to strategic management”.

Referencing Requirements:
1. Mintzberg, H., and Waters, J. A., (1985) Of Strategies Deliberate and Emergent, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6, PP 257-272

2. Mintzberg, H., (1990) The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 11, PP 171-195

3. Ansoff, H., (1991) Critique of Henry Mintzbergs The design school: reconsidering the basic premises of strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 12, PP 449-461

4. Kipping, M., and Cailluet, L., (2010) Mintzbergs Emergent and Deliberate Strategies: Tracking Alcans Activities in Europe 1928-2007, Business History Review, Vol. 84 PP 99-104

5. Pretorius, M., and Maritz, R., (2011) Strategy making: the approach matters, Journal of Business Strategy, Vol. 32 PP25-31