Oes illegal immigration help or hurt economy? annotated bibliography
Introduction: The introduction is a crucial part of the paper. It presents your purpose in writing (answering a question? arguing for an interpretation?), your rationale for the topic you selected, and your stance on the topic. It should also include a context for the various perspectives on your topic. The goal of the introduction is to establish a rationale for using the sources in Writing Project #4 and, at the same time, to offer a discussion that synthesizes the sources you have identified. This discussion should identify references to recurring issues, disputes, events, individuals, legal documents, or any other subject addressed by your sources. In other words, demonstrate why your research is cohesive, rather than just a random collection of sources.
At the end of the Introduction, you should offer a sentence that serves as thesis statement. Think of the tentative thesis as a a?state of the debatea? or a?overview of perspectivesa? statement; for example, you might write: Scholars are in complete disagreement over X; however, despite their disagreement on how it should be accomplished, all scholars place X as the goal.
List of Sources with Annotations: Each entry in the annotated bibliography begins with a bibliographical citation. See your handbook for the required MLA format. Annotations (500 words) for each source will be in paragraph form. You may have up to three paragraphs for each entry. Your goal is to clearly and concisely 1) describe the rhetorical situation, 2), summarize the source, and 3) evaluate the source. In addressing the rhetorical situation, describe the author, audience, publication, and purpose for writing. To summarize, provide the main claim/thesis and the primary ways the article supports its argument. In the evaluation, offer a statement regarding the quality and usefulness of the article to other scholars seeking to write about a similar subject. Finally, consider how the source will be used in WP #4. Will it help you take a position or deal with a counterargument?