Ompare and Contrast two Counterinsurgency campaigns

Compare and contrast the Philippines Insurrection and Vietnam. Analysis will identify three critical factors that led to success or failure on the battlefield as well as the overall importance of tactical success in achieving strategic goals. In the conclusion, synthesize the insights gained from the analysis that soldiers can apply to the Global War on Terrorism.

Ompare and Contrast two Counterinsurgency campaigns

Must be in APA style, need outline, title page, abstract, thesis, etc. The 1250 words must be the body cannot count outline, tite page, or abstract.
Paper must be written in history centric NOT a history report. 3 of the sources must be of a scholarly source, that I can find and print.

Comparison and contrast research paper on both the Counterinsurgency campaigns of the U.S. invasion of Cuba and the battle of liberation of the Phillipines 1898 Manila (both involving the Spanish American War). Need to cover how each campaign used policies of chastisement and policies of attraction . For Cuba discuss MG John Brooke and MG John Lenordwood and their policies of chastisement and polices of Attraction . What were the benefits and pitfalls of each. What were the long term results. For the Philippines cover MG Elwell S. Otis, MG Arthur MacAuthor and BG Fedrick Funston. What were the policies of attraction and policies of chasticement used , benefits and pitfalls of each and long term goals. Compare and contrast the difference and similarties of each conflict.