Oreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background -Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success

Topic:Foreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background
-Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success
20000 words
i have complete the dissertation , however it was fail and need to be re-write the whole dissertation , i will upload the fail and the dissertation feedback
below is the tutor email :
The negative from the two internal examiners was sort of expected. As mentioned throughout the course of the dissertation, the effort that you put in failed to meet the expectation of the dissertation requirement.

First, you dont have a strong literature review to support your hypothesis. Merely by citing some academic journal will not serve the purpose. The key is how can you leverage on some of the discussion topics or research variables and convert them into your hypothesis? Your research topic must be supported by academic journal articles. Your shot gun approach in citing reference only created chaos but no contribution in the setting up of your hypothesis.

Second, you dont have a strong and clear cut hypothesis issues (you seem to cover everything). Thus the setting was poorly laid out. Thus your research finding failed to tie in with the literature review variables.

Third, the research methodology was unacceptable for you just use some statistic to prove your case. This is not quantitative or qualitative. This part will destroy the validity of your study for it demonstrates no effort were engaged in digging out the issues. Thus the finding is not convincing and fail to support your claim.

It seems to me that you have to re-do the whole things with focus on correcting the errors and mistakes quoted by the internal examiners. They are the ones to review your work again. You must pay attention to their comments both on the comment sheet (general) and the dissertation assessment form (detail). You must commit your time to do a good job and honestly speaking, minor adjustment will not serve the purpose.

Keep up your good spirit and eliminate all no value added content but put back value added elements that help to support your work.

Oreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background -Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success

There is a writer has been down 40 page for the dissertation , however there is a comment from the tutor , which he is unable to do the last 40 page , so please do the last 40 page
thx
below is the tutor feedback from the first 40 page :

Dear writer,

Pls see below from my tutor what is your thought?

Merely performing an analysis of your chosen company in term of evaluating its Business model is possible, but difficult. The key is what do you want to prove? What criteria do you use? How do you validate your analysis? How does your generic model apply to other joint venture.

Based on your past work and the so-called new version, I do not see you are able to establish clear hypothesis issues (i.e. what do you want to prove, disapprove, accept or reject). This is critical in guiding your work. Merely quoting some articles related to JV is a shot-gun approach by throwing in literature review, but definitely lead you no where at the end.

Merely by saying government relation is important, cultural management is essential, core competences of Veolia is critical, financial success that counts, stake-holders interest should be focused. All these are conditions for operating in PRC, all entities operating in PRC bear the resemblance. How can you show Veolia is different?

Thus, if you just deal with general without specificities, I think your work will just be a laundry list of things to do in running JV in PRC.

Alternatively, you may want to conduct CSF for JV in PRC and check Veolias against it? But I really cant tell the amount of work involved and the degree of difficulty.

The above is my view about your thought towards your re-submission work.

And this is the last writer reply:

Dear Customer,

Your tutor wants you to establish your research hypothesis with the help of regression analysis and believes that a case study analysis of the company would not be enough. On the other hand, since there was no clear instruction beforehand, I had planned that after the review of prior studies on JVs in China, I would carry on with a comprehensive case study analysis of Veolia Water to assess its business model, its critical success factors, sustainability etc.
To put it in simple words, I was not expecting that this project would require a quantitative analysis, and there seems to be a apparent change of instruction now.

Thanks
Writer

Dear Customer,

I thought over this issue for long and since I have been working on this project for long and DO NOT want you to fail I would suggest you to place a new order asking the writer to do the quantitative analysis part. I have done the qualitative analysis part of around 10,000 words which will not go to waste and will be useful. But the rest of the part I think should be done with the help of special software. You tutor wants a regression analysis, and a complex one, which I fear would not be possible to do in excel.

Therefore all I can now suggest is pay me for the amount of work do by me that is, 40 pages and ask the admin to find a writer who can do the regression analysis part for you. These 40 pages are relevant and will be of use.

Thanks
Writer

here is the first comment when i get the fail dissertation

Topic:Foreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background
-Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success
20000 words
i have complete the dissertation , however it was fail and need to be re-write the whole dissertation , i will upload the fail and the dissertation feedback
below is the tutor email :
The negative from the two internal examiners was sort of expected. As mentioned throughout the course of the dissertation, the effort that you put in failed to meet the expectation of the dissertation requirement.

First, you dont have a strong literature review to support your hypothesis. Merely by citing some academic journal will not serve the purpose. The key is how can you leverage on some of the discussion topics or research variables and convert them into your hypothesis? Your research topic must be supported by academic journal articles. Your shot gun approach in citing reference only created chaos but no contribution in the setting up of your hypothesis.

Second, you dont have a strong and clear cut hypothesis issues (you seem to cover everything). Thus the setting was poorly laid out. Thus your research finding failed to tie in with the literature review variables.

Third, the research methodology was unacceptable for you just use some statistic to prove your case. This is not quantitative or qualitative. This part will destroy the validity of your study for it demonstrates no effort were engaged in digging out the issues. Thus the finding is not convincing and fail to support your claim.

It seems to me that you have to re-do the whole things with focus on correcting the errors and mistakes quoted by the internal examiners. They are the ones to review your work again. You must pay attention to their comments both on the comment sheet (general) and the dissertation assessment form (detail). You must commit your time to do a good job and honestly speaking, minor adjustment will not serve the purpose.

Keep up your good spirit and eliminate all no value added content but put back value added elements that help to support your work.

Oreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background -Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success

Topic:Foreign enterprise Manage the JV Company with state owned background
-Veolia wateras business model in china for its long term success
20000 words
i have complete the dissertation , however it was fail and need to be re-write the whole dissertation , i will upload the fail and the dissertation feedback
below is the tutor email :
The negative from the two internal examiners was sort of expected. As mentioned throughout the course of the dissertation, the effort that you put in failed to meet the expectation of the dissertation requirement.

First, you dont have a strong literature review to support your hypothesis. Merely by citing some academic journal will not serve the purpose. The key is how can you leverage on some of the discussion topics or research variables and convert them into your hypothesis? Your research topic must be supported by academic journal articles. Your shot gun approach in citing reference only created chaos but no contribution in the setting up of your hypothesis.

Second, you dont have a strong and clear cut hypothesis issues (you seem to cover everything). Thus the setting was poorly laid out. Thus your research finding failed to tie in with the literature review variables.

Third, the research methodology was unacceptable for you just use some statistic to prove your case. This is not quantitative or qualitative. This part will destroy the validity of your study for it demonstrates no effort were engaged in digging out the issues. Thus the finding is not convincing and fail to support your claim.

It seems to me that you have to re-do the whole things with focus on correcting the errors and mistakes quoted by the internal examiners. They are the ones to review your work again. You must pay attention to their comments both on the comment sheet (general) and the dissertation assessment form (detail). You must commit your time to do a good job and honestly speaking, minor adjustment will not serve the purpose.

Keep up your good spirit and eliminate all no value added content but put back value added elements that help to support your work.

The first hand in dissertation comment

Dear Writer,

Please see below is my tutors comments and kindly follow what he mentioned below. Just want to know whether you have my internal examiners comment for my failed dissertation or not, let me know if you dont have it .

Attached is my failed dissertation for your comparison. Due to time is really constrain, please proceed my dissertation ASAP thanks.
Ricky

This is the 2nd submission comment
In an attempt to assist for the re-submission of your dissertation, it is imperative for you to tell what are the changes of this new version from the old version. Bearing in mind, without a major over-haul in accordance to the comment by the Internal Examiners, I guess the chance of getting through is minimal.

Your original version seems to have the following problems:
1. Literature review has no integration to your research work
2. Poorly define hypothesis issues
3. Lack of quantitative research work to support your work
4. The so call findings are narrative/descriptive work of facts
5. Failing to validate your hypothesis with literature review
6. An explanatory work instead of research work

The best approach for you is to read through the internal examiners comments repeatedly and follow their comments to implement change. Based on what your draft work, I see no difference, or any significant change from your prior work. You must focus on your hypothesis and research!

Please pay attention to my comment in your work.

Tutors Last remark:

Pls see below from my tutor what is your thought?

Merely performing an analysis of your chosen company in term of evaluating its Business model is possible, but difficult. The key is what do you want to prove? What criteria do you use? How do you validate your analysis? How does your generic model apply to other joint venture.

Based on your past work and the so-called new version, I do not see you are able to establish clear hypothesis issues (i.e. what do you want to prove, disapprove, accept or reject). This is critical in guiding your work. Merely quoting some articles related to JV is a shot-gun approach by throwing in literature review, but definitely lead you no where at the end.

Merely by saying government relation is important, cultural management is essential, core competences of Veolia is critical, financial success that counts, stake-holders interest should be focused. All these are conditions for operating in PRC, all entities operating in PRC bear the resemblance. How can you show Veolia is different?

Thus, if you just deal with general without specificities, I think your work will just be a laundry list of things to do in running JV in PRC.

Alternatively, you may want to conduct CSF for JV in PRC and check Veolias against it? But I really cant tell the amount of work involved and the degree of difficulty.

The above is my view about your thought towards your re-submission work.