Rguing Against Nadelmanns Pro-Drug Position

Choose to argue against Nadelmanns pro-drug position. The first half of my paper should be unpacking Nadelmanns arguments and explaining them (making his position and the support for it explicit and well-defined), whereas the second half would be me attacking those arguments (which were made so clear in the first section). I could draw on the Dalrymple argument for criticisms, from class lecture, or come up with novel criticisms of my own that we did not consider through the course. Be sure you only discuss parts in the first part of your paper that you will be analyzing in the second (i.e. dont summarize superfluous information).

Text should be cited from philosophy textbook You Decide!by Bruce Waller.

If lecture notes or pictures of the text are needed, contact me to send Word documents of each lecture/page.