Ritical Commentary on Artical related to Philosophical Bioethics by Peter Singer (All Animal Are Equal)

The essay should be 2000 words in length and provide a crtical commentary on the attached paper All Animals Are Equalby Peter Singer. It should include:

1. The purpose of the article
2. The line of argument the writer is advancing and the key points in the argument.
3. Evidence or examples the writer use to support his argument
4. The underlying assumptions within the argument.
5. Commentary on the extent to which the authors arguments are convincing.
6.Suggested ways of strengthening the authors argument.

The paper should be written in Times New Roman and be double spaced.
Tim Dare,  Applied Ethics, Challenges to in Ruth Chadwick (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume 1 (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998) pp. 183  190

Timothy Chappel,  Theories of Ethics, Overview in Ruth Chadwick (Ed) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume 4 (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998) pp. 323  334

Matthew W. Hallgarth,  Consequentialism and Deontology in Ruth Chadwick (Ed) Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, Volume 1 (San Diego: Academic Press, 1998) pp. 609  621

Bonnie Steinbeck, Life Before Birth  The Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses, (New York: Oxford University Press, 1992) Chapter 2

Jonathan Glover, Causing Death and Saving Lives (Harmondsworth: Pelican, 1990) Chapter 17

Harris, J.  QALYfying the value of life Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (1987) 117  123

Harris J.  Would Aristotle have played Russian Roulette? Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (1996) 209  15

Singer, P; McKie, J; Kuhse, H. & Richardson, J.  Double jeopardy and the use of QALYs in health care allocation Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1995) 144 150

References within the text should follow the Harvard referencing System but include both year and page number i.e. (Smith, 1980 p21)