Ritically evaluate how people resourcing policies and practices can influence the level of employee commitment and engagement with in the workplace.

The course is Ms in Int Human resource management and the unit is people resourcing.

Critically evaluate how people resourcing policies and practices can influence the level of employee commitment and engagement with in the workplace.

Your report will utilize recent academic literature, which should underpin your arguments. You should show evidence of an exploration into current theoretical and professional models, debates and studies that will help you analyse the subject and the prevailing organizational policies and practices. The report must include a reference list and be correctly referenced within the text. Please take note of the assessment criteria and weighting below.

Application of theoretical concepts 40%
Critical analysis 40%
Research, referencing and bibliography 10%
Structure and presentation 10%

(concentrate on people resourcing policies and practices like work life balance, psychological contract, motivation etc and its models and try to link those with employee commitment and engagement and also some clearly differentiation between employee commitment and engagement.)

because of masters level so referencing must be Harvard system.
Some core materials:

Pillbeam, S & Corbridge, M (2006) people resourcing, 3rd Edition financial times/pitman publishing
Taylor, S (2005) people resourcing 3rd Edition, chartered institute of personnel and development.
Torrington, D & Hall, L (2005) Human resource management 6th Edition, Ft prentice Hall
Beardwell, I & Holden, L (2004) Human resource management: A contemporary Approach, 4rth Edition FT prentice Hall
Leopold, J, Harris, L, Watson, T (2005) The strategic management of human resources, FT prentice hall.

Websites
CIPD
And other journals
Try to use journals as much as possible and giving full referencing when use in the report than give referencing with the paragraph and in the end as well.

Good comprehensive answer demonstrating evidence of sound and relevant knowledge of subject. Well developed critical analysis, and application. Some evidence of originality but conclusions reached are not always substantiated. Presentation will be good with a good level of referencing. Logical presentation and clear structure: Makes most relevant links between areas of question as appropriate. Answers question brief fully.