Ritically evaluate Lockes two provisos and consider what relevance, if any, they have to the current debate over global warming.

Could the writer please use the harvard style for the bibliography and references.
Clarke & Kohler, Law in Context: Property Law 2005,
Lawson and Rudden Law of Property 3rd ed, 2002 Clarendon,
Munzer, A Theory of Property (1990, Cambridge) esp Ch 1 (Property, justification, and evaluation); Ch 2 (Understanding Property); Ch 3 (Persons and their Bodies); Ch 8 (Utility and Efficiency); Ch 9 (Justice and Equality); and Ch 10 (Labour and Desert),
Cooter and Ulen Law and Economics (Scott, Foresman and Company) esp Ch 1 (An Introduction to Law and Economics); Ch 4 (An Economic Theory of Property); and Ch 5 (Topics in the Economics of Property),
Clarke,  Property Law: Re-establishing Diversity Current Legal Problems 1997 Vol 50 Law and Opinion at the End of the Twentieth Century, 119,
Kohler  Common Property and Private Trusts in Locality and IdentityClarke  Use Time and Entitlement (2004 CLP),
Cotterell  The Law of Property and Legal Theory in Legal Theory and Common Law ed Twining (1986),
Palmer & McKendrick, Interests in Goods (2nd ed 1997, Lloyds of London Press),
Also consider articles from JSTOR and Heinonline.